Three things make Scottsdale's fee different from most cities', and all three are visible on the first line of the schedule.
The first is that there is no valuation anywhere. Nobody estimates what the building is worth. The City measures it instead: the area with A/C at $0.94 a square foot and the covered area without it at $0.54. A building full of expensive finishes and a building full of cheap ones of the same size pay the same permit fee. That makes an estimate easy to check — you need two numbers off the plans, not a cost opinion — and it makes the fee insensitive to everything except size.
The second is that the covered area is a second area, not a second name for the total. A 2,500 square foot house that includes 400 square feet of roofed patio without air conditioning is charged 2,500 square feet at $0.94 and 400 square feet at $0.54. Reading the two rows as two rates on one total — which is what the column layout invites — overstates the fee by more than $1,600 on that house.
The third is that plan review is not a percentage of anything. In Phoenix it is 100% or 80% of the permit fee; in Houston it is a separate per-$1,000 rate on valuation. Scottsdale publishes a second schedule with its own two area rates, $0.54 and $0.34, and no base fee at all. So the review is roughly 57% of the permit fee's area component — and it never carries the $237. A project whose plans are reviewed pays the base fee once, not twice.
What the City does not publish is a rate for electrical, plumbing or mechanical work. All three are issued permits, and the Miscellaneous schedule says the least thing about them that any document in this project has said: a one-discipline permit has a $121 minimum and a permit covering all disciplines a $379 minimum. Beyond those two floors, the trades are paid for by the building permit's area rate — the same amount for one circuit as for forty. That is a real difference from Texas, where a Houston electrical permit is priced per outlet and a Dallas one by how many trades the job involves.